Co-worker
conducting second job on company time / Hypocritical
letter-writer thwarting CEO
Dear Abby: One of my co-workers, "Roger," conducts
business for his second job—real estate—every day on
company time. Everyone in the office can hear him
"selling" on the phone.
My office-mates and I find
Roger's real estate paperwork scattered all over the
place—left in the copier or fax machine, even in the
lunch-room. He is constantly surfing the Internet
looking at houses.
Roger is a nice person with
a sweet wife and three little kids. However, my
office mates and I see the side of him that is
without morals.
I for one, don't know how
to treat him. All employees sign a "code of conduct"
each year in order to continue working for our
company. The document clearly states that employees
are to report anyone conducting outside business on
company time.
I'm torn about what to
do. I don't want to ruin this man's career, but I
feel I have broken a pledge by not reporting him.
What's the answer, Abby? —WORKING WITH A CHEAT IN
MICHIGAN
Abby's Reply:
DEAR WORKING: The person in
the office who is closest to Roger should have a
heart-to-heart with him, conveying the sentiments of
the rest of the employees. If that doesn't do the
trick, then all of Roger's co-workers—including
you—should sign a letter to the bosses informing
them about the breach in company policy. The names
should be listed in alphabetical order.
Roger's behavior is not
only dishonest, but it also undermines office moral.
A warning from his supervisor may teach him a lesson
and get him to shape up. If he's lucky he won't be
dismissed. —Abby
Gabby's Reply:
Hi Working: Your letter doesn't address the source
of the problem. Worded responsibly it would read,
"How do I
disappear the fear I have in my relationship with a
co-worker?" Or, "What drives
me
to continually thwart my CEO?"
As written, your letter
reveals that you are stuck in covert sabotage of
your CEO and that you are addicted to blaming,
specifically, your co-worker.
It also reveals that you
are unaware of the effects of an unacknowledged
out-integrity (a perpetration), by even one
employee, on the outcomes of a group, company,
organization, or team. For example: Would you trust
a brain surgeon who is cheating on his/her spouse to
operate on your brain?
Your signature,
"Working with a cheat . . ." suggests that you are
unaware that you are talking about yourself.
Roger merely mirrors your own "morals." Worse yet,
you and all the employees are mirroring the
out-integrity of your CEO.
Your sentence, ". . . I
feel I have broken a pledge . . ." indicates that
you are in denial. "Feel?" A responsible statement
would be, "I have broken my agreement and I have
supported my co-workers in badmouthing another and
in thwarting management as well." You have read and
understand the company's "Code of Conduct"
but you haven't owned it. In the enlightenment game
understanding
responsibility
is the booby prize.
Also, acknowledge yourself
for your integrity. Of the millions in the workforce
who daily create and condone such perpetrations, you
alone, among all of them, are bothered enough to
reach out for support. It also reveals that your
integrity,
though "out," is relatively close to the surface.
Although you have a few unacknowledged perpetrations
(keep reading) you don't yet have so many that you,
unlike Roger, are no longer aware of the consequnces
of deceit.
Because your problem is
extremely common throughout the workforce, I'm going
to mention here that your CEO has sabotaged him/her
self. Like Roger, he/she has unconsciously set it up
to get caught for a perpetration, one that is hidden
from everyone.
To begin with: It is
irresponsible for your CEO to dump such a "code" in
your space without making it clear exactly how to
support it, and, without having you verbally agree
to his/her face (eye-to-eye) to honor it. As you can
see, signed agreements, created by only one party to
the agreement, of themselves don't work. What you
signed is what's referred to as an
illusion of an agreement.
Because it was not communicated it was not
co-created; it's just the CEO's good idea of how
they want employees to behave. They have
had no intention for it to be honored. How do we
know? We know because it's not being honored. The
CEO is missing the respect it takes to inspire
integrity.
Another problem is that you
have a CEO who is missing certain fundamental
leadership-communication skills. Not to worry;
all commandants of military
academies are missing these fundamentals. All
commandants issue (as opposed to communicate) the
"Code of Honor" (read
Academy Scandals . . .).
Talking about, issuing, handing out, going over, or
saying the rules, (as opposed to co-creating,
through communication, the agreements) ensures that
they will not be honored. All "Academy" officers
(yes all) in the military now, are themselves
out-integrity. Each commissioned officer, if asked
by a communication-skills coach, one skilled at
creating space for the truth to be told, are able to
recall one or more infractions of the "Code of
Honor" by their fellow cadets for which they did not
handle the incident per the "Code" [. . . confront
the perpetrator and ask them to report themselves .
. .]. Powerful codes "delivered"
hypocritically by an individual (such as your CEO)
who him/her self is out-integrity, do not get
co-created and owned; communication does not take
place. Employees and cadets alike have absolutely no
choice (none what-so-ever) but to mirror the
integrity of their leader; there are no exceptions
to this
entanglement
phenomenon.
Notice also that your
leadership-communication skills have caused
(unconsciously intended) others to badmouth Roger
behind his back. You have been the leader of the
conspiracy. Instead of you acknowledging to him his
perpetration
the very first time, you set him up to do it again
and again. This is covert sabotage. You have
conveniently forgotten that it was you who
unconsciously intended for things to get this bad.
You see, it's really all about you.
It would work for
you to make an appointment with your CEO and get
clear exactly how to handle a person who is breaking
a rule. Then ask the CEO to communicate the
reporting process to everyone.*
There are clearing
processes that CEOs and managers can use to restore
and maintain the experience of integrity with in an
org. Before you make your
appointment I recommend that you
first do
The [free] Clearing Process for Professionals.
I have found, from
facilitating weekend-long communication-skills
workshops, and 4-month support groups, over a
period of 44+ years, that it takes me
three-hours to communicate ten agreements to 1 -
10 participants, and, between 5 and 10 hours to
communicate the same agreements to up to 100
participants, so that they are gotten, owned,
and honored.
What you're dealing with is
your own fear. Use the incident to get
counseling/coaching. Ask the facilitator to help you
locate and complete the very first similar incident
in your life. You are still handling similar
incidents based upon an unconscious decision you
made on how you handled that first one. There's a
perpetration you have not acknowledged. Until you
acknowledge it (first to yourself and then most
likely to your parents or a teacher) you will keep
creating
breakdowns in communication and "Rogers" in your
life to remind you to do so.
Tip: The incident
you're looking for will include you damaging
another's reputation, possibly getting them in
trouble because of your machinations. You will get
value from reading about
The Community Support Group. It's about how we,
you and I, back in grade school, unconsciously
intended those now in jail, to be there, and how we
still are intending for 42% of them to fail upon
parole. Another memory trigger (to help you recall
unacknowledged perpetrations) is
Reunion Conversations.
BTW: The company
rule, "that employees are to report anyone
conducting outside business on company time," will
keep creating these messes. It doesn't support
responsibility. I.e. "What am I doing/not doing,
that caused this problem?" Instead
you support "behind the back
tattle-tailing." Written supportively the agreement
would read, ". . . I agree to confront the
perpetrator and ask him/her to acknowledge the
perpetration to their immediate supervisor, and then
acknowledge, to me, that they have done so." Such a
policy can only be issued when there is also an
agreement to communicate openly, honestly, and
spontaneously (zero significant
withholds), through to mutual satisfaction, and
that no punishments will be issued. Thank you for your
letter. Millions have the same problem.
Because Roger doesn't seem to be concerned about
his obvious activities it would work to find out if
Roger might have some profit-commission-sharing deal
with the CEO—in exchange for office space. Perhaps
trying to sell the CEO's property?
—Gabby
*
Given
your fear I recommend that you begin by making a
hard copy of this post and slipping it to your CEO
(it might require creativity for you to have
certainty that they got and read it). There's
absolutely no way you can make a difference
unless he/she is willing to acknowledge the effects
of their leadership-communication skills, such as
they have had and are having on his/her staff and employees.
The results will either be transformational or, more
of the same (actually things will go downhill if
your CEO ignores the condition and doesn't engage
the services of a communication-skills coach). It
will not work to fire Roger or his manager; the
level of integrity they operate from is consistent with
everyone's integrity. A "manager" would not work for
such a company; the CEO has not performed to the
satisfaction of another "manager."