Should I go to
Grandma's funeral? / Gabby would have titled it: Should I keep
rewarding/empowering abusive family?
Dear
Annie: My grandmother [father's mother] is in poor
health and is not expected to live much longer.
Grandma never liked my mother, and consequently, is
not close to me. When my parents married, Grandma
selected the photographs for the wedding album, and
not one picture included my mother. Can you image
the effort involved to do such a thing? I always
feel like a stranger when I see her side of the
family.
When I married three
years ago, I was hurt that two of my paternal aunts
not only didn’t attend the wedding, but did not even
send a card to wish me well. When I told them how I
felt, they repeated it to my grandmother, who in
turn said some rather nasty things to me. I have not
seen or talked to her side of the family since.
When Grandma passes away
must I go to her funeral? I love my father very much
and realize I should have been there for him, but I
have tremendous resentment towards his family. Tell
me what to do.
—FRACTURED FAMILY IN OHIO
Abby's Reply:
Dear
Ohio: Go to the funeral, not only because it is the
classy thing to do, but because it would mean a lot
to your father. You don’t have to speak to the
relatives you dislike. Pay your respects, and then
leave. You won’t regret it. —ANNIE
Gabby's Reply:
Dear Fractured: Thanks so much for writing.
You speak for many families.
Whenever there is a conflict between two
there is always a third party who has a
vested interest in the friction, quite often
they do it covertly; most always they are
unaware that they are using their highly
developed, extremely powerful, non-verbal
leadership-communication skills to support
divisiveness (honestly believing that they
are the nice one). This person most always
pretends to be an ally. That is to say, the
friction couldn’t have taken place if your
father had said to his mother at the very
beginning, "Either you work out your
differences with my fiancé or I won’t be in
communication with you till you do."
In a loving supportive family it's the
child's [in this case, your father's]
responsibility to bring in someone the clan
finds compatible. For your father to
have married your mother reveals that he
disrespected his mother; by ignoring her
advice he brought her spiteful sabotaging
wrath down on himself and on you. For your
mother to have married into his clan reveals
that she disrespected her own family; she
submitted them to the abuse of your
husband's mother Read
An inconsiderate gift
to give a prospective partner).
Most always the seemingly innocent third
party (in this case your dad) unconsciously
sides with one of the adversaries (your
grandmother) and is supporting her in
treating you abusively rather than putting
himself on the line by saying, "Clean it up
Mom or I’ll recess you—until you get
therapy—for life if that’s what it takes."
Yes, your father needs an equal amount of
counseling.
You actually have more than one third
party.
Your "paternal
aunts" are also addicted to gossiping
divisive abuse. Notice the result they
produced by telling your grandmother what
you said, knowing full well she doesn't like
you? Communicating so as to get another in
trouble is both unethical and abusive, it's
called sabotage.
You have inherited a problem that your
father refused to resolve through to mutual
satisfaction. It appears that your
father went against his mother’s wishes
(marrying your mom) and you are suffering
for it. If he did it because his
family's line, that lineage, was in fact so
unethical or so damaged as to be considered
incurable then you should know why he
ignored and thwarted her. On the other hand,
if your grandmother knows something you
don’t and he disrespected her, then he
invalidated and thwarted the wisdom of his
own mother, for which there is a lifetime of
undesirable consequences. Keep in mind, in
terms of leadership, he is the one who
turned his own mother against his daughter.
One problem for
you is that you don’t know if grandmother’s
reasons for not liking your mother have to
do with a legal, ethical, moral, or another
valid issue, or, if her reasons are based
upon spite, prejudice, or bigotry. Perhaps
she’s simply a control freak that needs to
be gotten out from under. Because you don’t
know the source of the friction between your
grandmother and your mother you have yet to
make an intelligent conscious choice as to
whom to play with in life. In my day
bigoted, biased, or prejudiced parents would
often try to thwart their
child's mixed
(social, religious, or racial) marriage
and so familial
disobedience was a courageous act of
integrity; it's based upon the premise that
interacting with (rewarding or empowering)
bigots or criminals (within ones family)
begets a lifetime of messy problems.
You say, " . . . nasty things .
. . " but not whether they were true.
I'm concerned you can't see that your
husband has allowed/supported his mother in
treating you with such contempt and
disrespect? This reveals that he too has
similar issues within his family.
That you would bring your fiancé (now
husband) and his mother into your
family, without him first having
estranged
himself from them, is not a gift of love.
Could it be that you're paying for bringing
such a family into yours? Perhaps you
haven't acknowledge to your mother that you
now know that marrying into such a
dysfunctional family disappointed her, that
it didn't feel good, that it was in fact
abusive.
You ask for advice. This is your opportunity
to
estrange
yourself from your husband's entire family,
all of whom are clearly addicted to abuse,
and to start a new lineage. That, or
continue to teach your children to relate as
only you know how—which is to put up with
(intend) abuse. Even in your letter you have
unconsciously taken sides with one of the
adversaries (your father), whereas they all
need an equal amount of therapy.
There is a way for you to give all concerned
an ultimatum to fulfill whatever
requirements you desire in order for them to
be able to continue to be in communication
with you. For example: To each you would
write,
"I need to know that I am not the cause
of the abuse I experience within this
family. I have failed to inspire respect
and an experience of being loved and
valued. Towards this end I intend to
estrange
myself completely from all interactions
with everyone and immerse myself in
therapy/counseling/coaching until I feel
I can interact with you in a way that
feels good. I need to hear from
you, and all the others, that each of
you have attended 25 sessions of family
therapy and that you have cleaned up
your relationships with everyone before
I’m willing to engage in any
communications with any of you."
Once you deliver such an ultimatum you'll be
inundated with reassurances that everyone
loves you and dozens of excuses and
explanations. They might even go out of
their way to treat you nicely for a week or
two and then, the abuse will start up again.
The point being, don't issue the ultimatum
unless you can be trusted to follow through
with it. Each will try to get you to talk
with them; if even one succeeds then they
will lose even more respect for you.
So far, given your
present leadership-communication support
skills,*
it looks like they are all heading towards
their graves as blaming adversaries; it's
not what your ancestors struggled for.
Goodness knows to what extent a part of your
grandmother’s "poor
health" has to do with her
integrity,
and in fact the collective integrity of the
family. Her abuse towards you continues to
have undesirable karmic consequences for everyone,
but especially for her.**
For you to submit
yourself and your children to such abuse
will continue to have undesirable
consequences. For you to continue relating
with any of them will reveal that you have
been lying—saying you want harmony when the
results of your leadership-communication
skills prove otherwise.
The sad part is,
you will continue to damage your children;
your job is to model for them how to extract
oneself from an abusive relationship, else,
eventually, they too will be writing to an
advice columnist. No longer will you be able
to say you didn't know you were empowering
abuse.
To answer your
question: It's tantamount to suicide for me
to go to an event in which I'll most likely
trigger someone's abuse
(stink-eye/shunning). Why would I
consciously choose to be invalidated and
abused? Ah, I know. I'll do it so that I can
innocently trigger the abuse, causing them
to mistreat me, and then I'll make everyone
wrong. For you to attend such an event would
confirm your addiction to abuse, to abusing
and to being abused. Mo betta to hang with
people who love me and each other, yes?
Readers might wonder
why I don't advise you to ask your
grandmother why she treated you so
disrespectfully. I don't because of your
addiction to being incomplete; such a
conversation would support you both in being
even more incomplete. A person committed to
being complete would have resolved this
years ago. Be aware of a false
acknowledgment, "I'm sorry if
I've been abusive" —covert denial. With
aloha, Gabby
* Each of us have
the exact same amount of support skills.
Some use (albeit unconsciously) their
leadership-support skills to thwart so as to
cause those around them to stay stuck in
mediocrity; others use their support skills
to uplift and forward others. And, others
unconsciously use their support skills to
cause those around them to crash and burn
(including prison visits). The test for what
your intentions have been is to look at the
results those around you are producing.
**
When a person who operates from integrity is
rude to another it bothers the person of
integrity, so much so that they then clean
up the incident through to mutual
satisfaction. When a person who has
accumulated a lifetime of perpetrations
refuses to clean up an abusive communication
they go unconscious so they don't have to
accept responsibility for having caused the
friction. They unconsciously keep
communicating abusively hoping someone will
be sharp enough to support them in cleaning
it up. They accumulate so many incompletes
(out-integrities), so many
communication
breakdowns, that it begins to
cost them their aliveness (no joy and
happiness) —eventually it begins to effect
their health; it appears that your
grandmother's "poor" health began with abuse
number one [most likely a childhood
incident] which she has yet to acknowledge
or clean up.