About cancer—the remission/reoccurring cycle

Precluding predictable problems
Post Reply
Gabby
Site Admin
Posts: 455
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2005 11:24 am

About cancer—the remission/reoccurring cycle

Post by Gabby » Mon Sep 21, 2020 1:35 pm

Premises:
  • One is either willing or not willing to look at, to talk about, cancer from the point of view of cause.
  • To disappear any problem one must first intend it—one must choose, to not only have it, but to have intended it (albeit, unconsciously).*
  • A problem persists because it's being talked about, it's not being defined accurately; talking about a problem causes it to persist whereas communication disappears it.**
  • You'll know you're in the presence of a healer if they begin the first appointment with a clearing process during which you are asked, "What thought comes to mind if this ailment is about you paying yourself back for a perpetration?"***
  • In all cases in which cancer has returned one will find that both the patient and the healer are withholding one or more significant thoughts from someone of significance. It's not that an unacknowledged perpetration causes cancer; it's that once a deceitful withhold has been verbally communicated one can be certain the cancer isn't about withholding.
  • The above premises pertain to you only if you find yourself arguing about them. They may or may not pertain to anyone else.
  • Recidivism, as pertains to health, refers to the fact that 42% of all parolees return to prison—in part because they have not been acknowledged for perpetrations they committed prior to the crime for which they were incarcerated, or the petty unacknowledged infractions committed while incarcerated.

* Often what one hears is, "Thanks to God my cancer is gone." —this reveals a resistance to communicating responsibly (from cause). —seldom does one hear, "Thank you God for giving me cancer."

** The majority of health-care professionals only took the speech-communication courses required for their major. They believe that what they know about communication is what it is; as you've discovered, most "professionals" are connable. Universities, colleges and academies only introduce students to the fundamentals and principles of inter-personal communication. All, yes all, college students (including education and health care majors) are granted diplomas without having demonstrated the ability to communicate openly, honestly, and spontaneously within their own family; all graduates have one or more withholds (deceptions) between them and their family members. None have yet to be effectively introduced to, none have discovered, the correlation between personal integrity and outcomes. Most parents (using what they were taught about communication) teach their children to deceive, evidenced by the fact that most dating teens con each other into deceiving both sets of parents so as to have sex (all ignorant of the consequences of such deceit).

*** A healer who operates from integrity, one who communicates openly, honestly, and spontaneously (zero significant thoughts withheld from significant others), is a safe space for truths to be told.

For more:

Thoughts about Remote Healing Research

Communications in Support of Health

Last edited 11/14/22

Post Reply