Transformation: v 4.24

Transformation as used here refers to more than change, adding to, or taking away. Werner Erhard, est, "Erhard Seminars Training") described it to be closer to transubstantiate; same looks different substance. As pertains to an abusive relationship, it would look the same but the outcomes from conversations would be mutually satisfying.

To have a transformed communication model means; as a teacher, before experiencing transformation, you would assign homework and several students would not do it. Afterwards, from a transformed space, when you communicate your intention for everyone to complete the homework, all would complete it. And, you'd use the same words both times.

For example:

Teacher A: "Read pages 236 through 250."

Teacher B: "Read pages 236 through 250."

The results:

"Teacher A" had no intention for all the students to complete the homework and so certain students got his/her unconscious communication and did not complete their homework.

On the other hand, "Teacher B's" students knew that she/he tells the truth and means what they say and so students complete their homework.

Teacher "A" would argue, defend, explain, justify his/her results, their position; "Yah but...," "Parents don't...," "Some students just don't listen," "You can't expect...," "You don't understand..., etc." The "teacher" communicates in such a way as to prove their belief. In truth, "Teacher A," the person receiving pay for being a teacher, is somewhere in the process of becoming a teacher, afraid to do what it would take to ensure all students learn to the criteria, to be that "strict."

A person who tells the truth, who communicates from and with intention, needs no explanations.

This stuff is not included in any college, university, or academy speech-communication curriculum for education majors. Why? Because "teachers" depend upon income. A certified "teacher" is always willing to not have a relationship, a student; administrators accept it when a teacher un-enrolls a student for any reason. A teacher gets into communication with a student and guides the student into requesting to be taught to a standard, to tell the truth, to honor agreements.  A teacher agrees, I will teach you to passing standards, providing you honor your agreements with me. A student must have a clear (up-front) choice to attend a class or not.

Note: If a world renown cancer specialist tells you that you have cancer, you, and most everyone, trusts the doctor's wisdom and integrity (doctors have professional peer agreement, that the doctor is correct, that he/she is telling the truth). The same applies to teachers.* When a teacher says, "Your child needs other subject matter before taking my class" everyone knows, with absolute certainty, that the teacher is correct. I'm unaware of any public education system that retains a Leadership-Relationship Communication-Skills Coach (a communicologist) who has certified its teachers as skilled at communicating subject matter. Parents would know that a teacher tells the truth and honors his her agreements at home and work.

 * I'm unaware of any public school that has even one teacher. When a school has a teacher, that teacher-leader supports the success of every other teacher. A certified  teacher would not submit students to another day with a "wanna-be teacher," someone whom most everyone agrees, requires leadership training.