Press your browser's back button to return to the page you came from.

 
     

 

Quotes from our various tutorials and Dear Gabby letters


 

v 12.2

 
     
  • All breakdowns in communication between two can be traced to one of these four variables.

  • Acknowledging someone completes a relationship (for that moment, then one immediately recreates a new one with new or the same agreements).

  • When you discover someone has withheld something from you it is irrefutable proof that you are the source of the dishonesty in your life and relationships because you'll notice that you began the deceit by withholding something from them —there are no exceptions to this phenominon.

  • Spanking is what a parent resorts to when he/she has lost their ability to produce a desired behavior lovingly through verbal communication.

  • Until one cleans up life's perpetrations, all communication breakdowns, to include broken agreements, are somewhat a consequence of one's integrity. Once one's integrity has been restored then a broken agreement is solely a communication problem, not a communication and/or an integrity problem.

  • If you attend a wedding in which you know for certain there is deception between the bride or groom, or between either of them and their parents, then you are condoning-supporting deception, in which case the relationship cannot expand and grow because friendship with you does not inspire honesty.

  • All relationships that fail do so in part because both partners withheld his/her thought of choice at the very beginning. There are no exceptions to this phenomenon."thought of choice" means, I'll withhold any thought I want for any, or no reason, which automatically causes you (gives you permission) to withhold whatever thought you want, say for instance that you've had lingering thoughts about finding a store clerk attractive. In an open and honest relationship all thoughts are shared verbally, especially the ones the mind thinks would be better, safer, less hurtful/upsetting, to withhold.

  • It is impossible for your relationship with your partner to grow and expand if you hide your thought of choice (it's called deceit). Your partner may start out open and honest but by the time you are through with them you will have trained him/her to hide their thoughts of choice from you.

  • You cannot create nor sustain an experience of love and happiness in a space occupied by deceit.
     
  • Arrogance is, thinking you can create and sustain the experience of love and happiness without cleaning up your childhood lies and deceits.
     
  • People with unacknowledged deceptions attract others who have the same stuff going on, that’s why they can’t see it in others.
     
  • Under the reasons is the truth of what the cheating was about—it's never ever what either partner say was his/her reason. Dragging such a lie into the next relationship guarantees more deciet.  Supporting a partner in lying about the cause of the failure of his/her previous relationship ensures the present one won't work either.
     
  • There can be no experience of love when there is no experience of respect. Concept of love yes, experiences no.
     
  • In a relationship in which there is an experience of communication (open, honest, and spontaneous, zero thoughts withheld) it is virtually impossible for one partner to have persistent preoccupying thoughts of another except that those thoughts are shared openly and therefore nipped in the bud.

  • In a committed relationship it works to communicate, if not up front, then right now today, "Can we agree that cheating is tantamount to effecting a divorce? I will not grant a second chance on this issue. Is this absolutely clear?" If your partner senses you are lying, that you will not effect an immediate divorce, they'll get it. In other words, if you lie to them, (if you don't really mean that you will divorce them) you will discover your lie. A fidelity agreement not communicated clearly and verbally like this communicates (implies) that you will tolerate and "forgive" cheating. It also implies that you reserve the option to cheat and that you assume they will give you a second chance. This unconscious implied reserved option is partly why most people don't include the consequences of cheating in their marriage vows.
     
  • Here's what I recommend be included in a marriage vow: "A measure of my commitment to you is to be faithful. To be unfaithful would immediately annul this marriage and forfeit my right to sue for children, alimony, or jointly held possessions.
     
  • Addiction to abuse, to abusing or creating being abused, is as debilitating as any drug.

  • Children are extremely susceptible to the vibrations of an out-integrity of a parent. Not unlike a magnet next to a compass, the child has no choice but to go off course. In lay terms: The confusion causes them to lose control of their directions/choices.

  • A person who is whole and complete would simply not attract or date someone stuck in abuse. You are unconsciously masterminding the abuse to satisfy your addiction, to get your daily fix of abuse.
[ top ]

Quotes for teens:
  • Conning a girl into having sex knowing full well it would upset her father is not smart karmic-wise. Your integrity will set up life for you to get what it was like for him for you to thwart him.

  • Conning a boy into repeatedly asking for sex is unethical. A "No" communicated gets gotten and transforms the relationship. A no "said" but not meant (not communicated) is a lie. A lie (or deceit between you and your parents) creates consequences such as an "accidental" pregnancy or deceptions later during a marriage.

  • Teens thinking of having sex must share such  thoughts with both sets of parents, else the professed love is not love. Love cannot exist in a space occupied by deception.
     

[ top ]

Quotes from the Spouse Abuse Tutorial

We begin with a definition of the word abuse.

  • If you enter the word "abuse" in Google it brings up about 50,900,000  references. What's interesting is that no two of the websites that offer abuse support or help use the same definition of the word abuse. More interestingly, no two teachers in any school, or any two judges in the world, have the same definition of the word abuse.

  • All the energy and money spent on preventing, eliminating, reducing, or controlling abuse is to no avail until we agree on a definition of what it is.

  • As you read About the Tutorial you will end up with an expanded definition of the word abuse.

For permission to quote please Contact Us. Permission is always granted with the agreement that you will acknowledge Kerry or Community Communications

Sponsored by Community Communications, a  501(c)(3) nonprofit education organization

[ top ]  

 

Elaborations

Acknowledging
Spanking
Perpetrations
Wedding guest
Withholds
Hiding a thought
Arrogance

 

"...perpetrations and
out-integrities
 are always being
 communicated
 nonverbally, they
 are always
 having an effect."

Definitions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
     


Press your browser's back button to return to the page you came from.