Originally written by Kerry for
tutorial
reference material, rewritten for
Communication Weekly which has
since gone off line.
Co-creating a
marriage vow that precludes cheating
The following is a belated engagement gift for couples about
to tie the knot.
This tip is about declaring up-front the kinds of behaviors/activities
that are unacceptable, behaviors that will automatically trigger, with
absolutely no second chance, the divorce/annulment clause of your unique
marriage vow. It's about co-creating a marriage vow that defines the
boundaries about fidelity (cheating), abuse (hitting), & specific
illegal activities.
It's about consciously including a fidelity agreement in your
marriage vow. I say consciously because a marriage vow that does not
contain a verbal/written fidelity agreement does in fact contain an
implied* non-verbal agreement; it non-verbally implies that cheating
will possibly be
allowed/forgiven. We know this to be true based upon
the results typical marriage vows produce (approx.
41% of marriages have incidents of
infidelity).
A fidelity agreement is a gift to you from millions and millions of
divorced couples who, when they were exchanging marriage vows, never
dreamed that cheating would take place in their marriage (read
Sandra,
Elen, Jenny: cheating and responsibility).
A fidelity agreement acknowledges that implied agreements have an
effect. Put another way, if, after reading this tip, you don't verbally
co-create a fidelity agreement with your partner then you both are
unconsciously implying that cheating might be supported/forgiven. After
reading this tip infidelity won't be an unconscious act, it will in fact
be premeditated
abuse.
A fidelity agreement is so clear that your wedding guests, both sets of
parents, and any/all witnesses to the ceremony, will not support either
of you suing the other for alimony, possessions, or child custody in the
event you cheat on your spouse or if you manipulate or cause/intend your
spouse to cheat on you. It supports open, honest, and spontaneous
communication, and personal responsibility. It precludes either spouse
from later blaming the other, saying. "I didn't know." "I had no idea .
. ." "I thought we were happy."
When a couple are in-communication with each other (see
Clearing Process
for Couples) it's virtually impossible for one to withhold even the
thought of committing a perpetration. Cheating/illegal activities take
place when both partners become stuck doing their
imitation of
communication. There is no such thing as an "innocent" spouse—be they
the spouse of an investment banker, a stock broker, or a Mafia Don—all
unethical activities are enabled by an equally powerful supporter. In a
truly expanding loving relationship neither partner dares insult/offend
the other with any questionable activity, such is their respect for each
other, both sets of families, and others.
A fidelity agreement further acknowledges that most of us cannot hear
our own lies therefore we often cannot tell when another is lying to us.
Few divorced couples were conscious enough to know they were lying when
they swore to each other, before God, ". . . till death do us part . .
." Most honestly believed they were telling the truth, few were aware
that that lie determined the outcome. A lie believed does not make it
the truth.
For a fidelity agreement to work all friends and wedding guests must
communicate the
Wedding Guest Vow to the engaged couple.
*The prevailing implied non-verbal agreement, the one that's
unconsciously included in most of today's wedding vows, is, . . . if I
cheat I expect you to accept my apology and forgive me and remain
married to me. And, if you cheat on me I will badmouth you to others and
blame you rather than acknowledge that my leadership-communication
skills intended the result. We know this is the agreement because of the
results.
Note: Couples contemplating marriage are advised to schedule a free
three-hour
consultation with a communication-skills coach. A consult
will bring to the surface life's accumulated unacknowledged
perpetrations,
incompletes that need to be acknowledged (completed) so
as to restore the
integrity of both partners. Most heated (carried
forward) arguments between couples are about earlier and similar
interactions with one's parents, interactions, the outcomes of which
remain less than satisfying; un-acknowledged, these incompletes are
non-verbally dramatized affecting each and every interaction.
Incompletes determine the success/failure of a relationship.
Use this Comment form for comments/feedback (Free-no registration)